Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] Runtime Interpreted Power Sequences

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 08/16/2012 12:47 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 12:38:33PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
> 
>> Note that this somewhat conflicts with accessing the top-level power
>> sequence by name too; perhaps that should be re-thought too. I must
>> admit this DT rule kinda sucks.
> 
> Given that currently the information there is useless and ignored is
> there any reason we can't just change the rule?  It'd be rather more
> constructive...

I'll start a new thread on that topic and see. I would simplify matters
a lot...

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux