On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 02:54:55PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote: > On 07/15/2012 03:21 PM, Mark Brown wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 10:45:12PM +0530, Laxman Dewangan wrote: > >> I was thinking that 1/2 should also go through your tree to > >> avoid any functionality break on existing platform who are using > >> this regulator. > > I'd be happy to do that if the ARM people are happy with it; just > > let me know and resend the patch if you want me to apply it. > Patch 2/2 really depends on patch 1/2 to avoid git bisect breakage; > are you able to rebase it to maintain that order when applying it? No, especially since Linus already merged the regulator changes for 3.6.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
