On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 7:46 PM, Chris Ball <cjb@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi, > > On Sun, Jul 15 2012, Muthu Kumar wrote: >>> I've already replied to a later version of the patch, but just to get >>> this comment in at the appropriate point of the discussion as well: >>> >>> Even though it would result in a cleaner sysfs, I don't want to do >>> this now because it will break userspace scripts that are depending >>> on the current locations of these attributes. >> >> Maya is adding a new sysfs attribute with that patch. So, there should >> not be any user space stuff that depends on it. > > In the later patchset, Maya's "[PATCH v4 1/2] mmc: card: Move MMC > specific attributes to mmc sub-directory" moves the existing attributes > into the mmc/ directory. > > It's that move that I'm objecting to, rather than the creation of a new > directory -- although since we're going to leave the current attributes > where they are, it might not make sense to add the new directory. > > We'd be creating two places that people have to look for mmc-related > attributes, which is arguably less clean than having one place to look > even though it's mixed in with the other block device attributes. So, what is the plan for fixing the user land tools and cleaning this up? Jens, What do you think? Regards, Muthu > > Thanks, > > - Chris. > -- > Chris Ball <cjb@xxxxxxxxxx> <http://printf.net/> > One Laptop Per Child -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
