Re: [PATCH] security: Minor improvements to no_new_privs documentation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 5 Jul 2012, Kees Cook wrote:

> On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 11:23 AM, Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > The documentation didn't actually mention how to enable no_new_privs.
> > This also adds a note about possible interactions between
> > no_new_privs and LSMs (i.e. why teaching systemd to set no_new_privs
> > is not necessarily a good idea), and it references the new docs
> > from include/linux/prctl.h.
> >
> > Suggested-by: Rob Landley <rob@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Acked-by: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Rob or James, do either of you have a high-priority tree for Linus? It
> would be great to get this into 3.5.

I push to Linus like this via for-linusN

- James
-- 
James Morris
<jmorris@xxxxxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux