On Monday 25 June 2012, Felipe Balbi wrote: > > > Can't this live where the scp drivers live? Actually, where is that at? > > > Do we have scp drivers? > > AFAIK, there isn't any driver for scp. But we have a driver for ocp > > and it is present at arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_l3_noc.c > > I don't think this deserves a directory of its own. Maybe > drivers/platform/arm/omap/ ?? the l3_noc is an OMAP-specific > interconnect and the SCP bus is also an OMAP-specific bus. I don't know > of any other arch/soc who uses the same interconnect IP as OMAP and the > same ocp2scp bridge. That bridge was created by TI for all I know. > > Greg, would drivers/platform/arm/omap/ work for you ? We could also move > the interconnect drivers there. I really don't like the idea of introducing drivers/platform/arm/ because very little of the stuff that one would put in there are actually ARM specific. I have suggested a drivers/bus/ before and people did not see the need back then, and we agreed to continue having a directory for each bus, as we have for the big ones (pci, usb, i2c, spi, ...) and a lot of simple (amba, rapidio, bcma, ...) or obscure (tc, vlynq, nubus, ...) ones. I think we should reconsider the idea of drivers/bus/ with a file per bus in there at least for new buses, but doing a new drivers/scp/ would be ok for me if there is enough opposition against the idea of drivers/bus aggregating different buses. Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
