On 06/21/2012 11:17 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Thursday 21 June 2012, Mark Brown wrote: ... >> I'm also not sure if the tooling works well for allowing people to >> include standard DTs for chips and add new properties to nodes for the >> board specific configuration, though I think I've seen a few things >> which suggested that was dealt with reasonably well. > > It should never be necessary to add board-specific properties in the > nodes that describe the SoC specific bits. What I was referring to > is just moving the data that currently resides in the regulator > driver into DT. I guess I must be misunderstanding that comment - there are many many examples of boards adding properties to nodes that describe the SoC. For example, the GPIOs used by SDHCI controllers, board-specific max clock rates for SDHCI or I2C controllers, pinmux configuration properties, to name just a few. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
