On Tuesday 19 June 2012 03:02 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
* PGP Signed by an unknown key
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 11:21:26AM +0530, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
Add API to match the chip regulator's id by the
property of "regulator-compatible" on regulator node.
We shouldn't have two different methods for doing this, we should
standardise this over all regulator drivers (or at the very least those
using the existing framework code) - having the old framework in place
will at best be confusing for authors of new drivers. We either need to
make it clear which framework to use or (ideally) remove the old
framework.
Agree. Currently following regulators are using this (based on grep)
mfd/tps6586x.c
regulator/ab8500.c
regulator/db8500-prcmu.c
and regulator/tps65910.
If the related change in tps65910 is fine and there is no more
concern/feedback on the approach then I can create a series of patch to
modify the other regulator and related dts file to follow the same.
If you want, I can make the new changes as part of this series or can
start with new series.
I like to go with new series patch for other change once this is accepted.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
