On 06/18/2012 10:26 PM, Rob Landley wrote: > On 06/18/2012 06:48 AM, Zheng Liu wrote: >> Hi Jens, >> >> I meet a problem when I use ionice(1) to adjust a process's io priority. >> I do the following operations: >> >> $ ionice -p${pid} >> none: prio 0 >> $ ionice -p${pid} -c2 -n4 >> $ ionice -p${pid} >> best-effort: prio 4 >> $ ionice -p${pid} -c0 -n0 >> $ ionice -p${pid} >> best-effort: prio 0 >> >> So I cannot set scheduling class back to 'none'. If I call ioprio_set(2) >> directly, it will be fine. But if I use ionice(1), I cannot change it. I >> read the docs about ionice in [1]. I notice this code: >> >> switch (ioprio_class) { >> case IOPRIO_CLASS_NONE: >> ioprio_class = IOPRIO_CLASS_BE; >> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ >> *It means that we cannot set back to none.* >> break; >> case IOPRIO_CLASS_RT: >> case IOPRIO_CLASS_BE: >> break; >> case IOPRIO_CLASS_IDLE: >> ioprio = 7; >> break; >> default: >> printf("bad prio class %d\n", ioprio_class); >> return 1; >> } >> >> My question is why we need to ban the user to set back to 'none'. Is there >> some reasons? Thank you. > > Since I'm CC'd, I'll explicitly say I haven't a clue why it does this. Thank you all the same. :-) Regards, Zheng -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html