On 06/10/2012 12:24 PM, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> From: Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Fix gpio number assignment, so that it can match the number stated in the comment.
>
> Cc:
> Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> .../devicetree/bindings/mmc/fsl-imx-esdhc.txt | 4 ++--
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/fsl-imx-esdhc.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/fsl-imx-esdhc.txt
> index c7e404b..fea541e 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/fsl-imx-esdhc.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/fsl-imx-esdhc.txt
> @@ -29,6 +29,6 @@ esdhc@70008000 {
> compatible = "fsl,imx51-esdhc";
> reg = <0x70008000 0x4000>;
> interrupts = <2>;
> - cd-gpios = <&gpio0 6 0>; /* GPIO1_6 */
> - wp-gpios = <&gpio0 5 0>; /* GPIO1_5 */
> + cd-gpios = <&gpio1 6 0>; /* GPIO1_6 */
> + wp-gpios = <&gpio1 5 0>; /* GPIO1_5 */
Are you sure all these aren't just DT is 0 based and the chip is 1 based
numbering?
Rob
> };
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
