Hi, On 06/06/2012 03:38 PM, Artem Bityutskiy wrote: >> +#else +#define lpc32xx_nand_resume NULL +#define >> lpc32xx_nand_suspend NULL +#endif > > 0, not NULL. Can you please point me to an explanation for this? NULL sounds natural here, since it is used as a pointer, and other nand drivers are already doing it via NULL: bcm_umi_nand.c bf5xx_nand.c pxa3xx_nand.c r852.c s3c2410.c tmio_nand.c txx9ndfmc.c ... and none is #defining as 0. Thanks in advance, Roland -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html