On 05/09/2012 04:45 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > +Local versions of the bitmask operations are also provided. They are used in > +contexts where the operations need to be performed atomically with respect to > +the local CPU, but no other CPU accesses the bitmask. This assumption makes it > +possible to avoid the need for SMP protection and use less expensive atomic > +operations in the implementation. > +They have names similar to the above bitmask operation interfaces, > +except that _local is sufficed to the interface name. suffixed (better: appended) -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
