Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] CPU hotplug, cpusets: Fix issues with cpusets handling upon CPU hotplug

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2012-05-04 at 13:49 -0700, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> I think it's ok for hotplug to be destructive. But I guess I'm not
> entirely sure why cpusets can't retain user-inputted
> configuration/policy information even while destroying things currently?
> And re-instating that policy if possible in the future? 

Two issues here:
 - if you retain it for cpuset but not others that's confusing (too);
 - we never retain anything, if you unload a module you loose all state
that was associated with it too. What makes this special?


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux