On Tue, 21 Feb 2012 11:46:03 +0100, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 7:27 AM, Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Update gpio.txt based on recent discussions regarding interaction with the > > pinctrl subsystem. > > > > Previously, gpio_request() was described as explicitly not performing any > > required mux setup operations etc. > > > > Now, gpio_request() is explicitly as explicitly performing any required mux > > setup operations where possible. In the case it isn't, platform code is > > required to have set up any required muxing or other configuration prior to > > gpio_request() being called, in order to maintain the same semantics. > > > > This is achieved by gpiolib drivers calling e.g. pinctrl_request_gpio() in > > their .request() operation. > > > > Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Grant can you take this one? I'd prefer for you to have a look at > it as well. I've taken this one, but left the 2nd for Olof. g. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
