On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 11:41 AM, Roland McGrath <mcgrathr@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I don't think TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME is apropos here. That only triggers on > returning to user mode, i.e. after syscall exit. But regardless of the > exact implementation details, I don't think it will be prohibitive to add > some means by which the fast-path can back off before actual syscall entry > and go to the slow path for ptrace reporting. > > Since there is no strong reason to think it can't be reorganized that way > later, I don't see any good rationale for constraining the seccomp-filter > feature definition based on a plan to optimize the implementation in the > future. Sounds good to me. I'll move to ptrace_event and save the problem of code organization for the future. Thanks! -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
