On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 9:28 AM, Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Yes, I can add the open source also but like to be in incremental change. > Not together with open drain. > We can go with: > - open drain core driver support. > - open drain sysfs interface support > - open source core driver support > - open source sysfs interface. > > I have already changes for the first 2 which we can review/apply, > Meanwhile I will work on open source support. > > Does it look good? Well as a patch concept it is OK but I have real bad feelings about patch [2/4] and [4/4] adding sysfs. What the GPIO subsystem really needs is to get rid of sysfs interfaces, have them deprecated and replaced with a per-gpiochip /dev/gpioN with ioctl()s or similar instead. The sysfs interface is just ... it won't scale. Yours, Linus Walleij -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
