On Thu, Feb 02, 2012 at 12:15:52PM -0200, Fabio Estevam wrote: > On 2/2/12, Richard Zhao <richard.zhao@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > >> Without imx-sgtl5000.c in place, this patch only introduces dead code > >> at the moment. > > Each patch make sense too without sgtl5000. > > Well, as this patch goal is to provide audio support to mx6sabrelite, > we need imx-sgtl5000 in place to test it, right? My goal seem less important here. You see I'm adding more and more things into the patch series, which is out of my goal. The maintainers only consider right patch go to right git. > How can we know that > don't get a kernel oops or something? patch pass building is possible go to upstream too. > > Regards, > > Fabio Estevam -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
