RE: [PATCH v5] ramoops: use pstore interface

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>>>  static int __exit ramoops_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>>  {
>>> +#if 0
>>> +     /* TODO(kees): We cannot unload ramoops since pstore doesn't support
>>> +      * unregistering yet.
>>> +      */
>>
>> Well that sucks.  Is pstore getting fixed?
>
>Tony, any plans for changing this? I'm ready when it does! :)
>
>

I have an question about this.

Are there any specific usecases you need to unload ramoops?

If users really would like to get kernel messages, unregistering ramoops is not needed.

Seiji
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux