On 10/19/2010 10:22 AM, Amerigo Wang wrote:
Remove the obsolete sysctl syscall. It was scheduled to be removed in Sept.
I thought at least older glibc was still using it? Did anyone check what happens if it sees no sysctl(2)? I think it's ok to remove the full tables, but keeping a wrapper just for the functionality glibc use(s/d) is still a good idea. -Andi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
