On Tuesday 29 June 2010 15:01:14 Jiri Kosina wrote: > On Tue, 29 Jun 2010, Kulikov Vasiliy wrote: > > > > Indeed. I mixed things. > > > > > > But Coccinelle was already in Karmic [1]. > > > Can you submit a patch with 9.10 instead of 10.04 ? > > > > > > I will Ack it. > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > [1] https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/coccinelle > > > > As you see in [1], coccinelle version in Karmic is 0.1.9. > > I don't know if it is buggy for linux. > > > > In documentation it is 0.2.0: > > > Coccinelle (>=0.2.0) is available through the package manager > > > of many distributions, e.g. : > > > > > > - Debian (>=squeeze) > > > - Fedora (>=13) > > > - Ubuntu (>=10.04 Lucid Lynx) > > > - OpenSUSE > > > - Arch Linux > > > - NetBSD > > > - FreeBSD > > > > So, if 0.1.9 is OK, I can make smth like this: > > > - Ubuntu (>=9.04 Karmic Koala, coccinelle = 0.1.9) > > Do we really want all this in kernel documentation in the first place? > It addresses a comment [1] I got during the review process. [1] http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/5/10/316 > -- Nicolas Palix Tel: (+33) 1 44 27 87 25 Tel: (+33) 6 81 07 91 72 Web: http://www.diku.dk/~npalix/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
