Re: [PATCH 1/8] PM: Opportunistic suspend support.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi!

> > > > The main and most important one being that suspend is a global property
> > > > and can/will hurt sensible tasks. It puts the whole task model upside
> > > > down.
> > > 
> > > OK, so I believe you have an android phone ... it already implements
> > > this model ... specifically what are the problems on that platform this
> > > causes?
> > 
> > I do not have one, nor have I ever written an application for it (nor
> > will I likely ever do that, since I detest Java), but I would expect an
> > application to run when its runnable.
> 
> OK, so I've got one ... tell me what I should see and I'll try to
> reproduce.

Umm... try to boot ordinary distro and see how it copes with
opportunistic suspend?

I do have android here, and of course it work well with custom
userland. Question is: can common distro be reasonably modified to
work with suspend blockers, in a way that's backward compatible?
									Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux