Hello, On 04/29/2010 11:16 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >>> Also, we already have one PM workqueue. It is used for runtime PM, but I guess >>> it may be used just as well for the opportunistic suspend. It is freezable, >>> but would it hurt? >> >> No, it works, the freezable flag is just ignored when I call >> pm_suspend and I don't run anything else on the workqueue while >> threads are frozen. It does need to be a single threaded workqueue >> though, so make sure you don't just change that. > > Freezable workqueues have to be singlethread or else there will be unfixable > races, so you can safely assume things will stay as they are in this respect. Rafael, can you elaborate a bit more on this? Just in case I missed something while doing cmwq as it currently doesn't have such limit. Thanks. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
