On Thu, 4 Mar 2010 02:19:37 -0600 Michael Witten wrote: > On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 01:33, Michael Witten <mfwitten@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > + <function>get_cpu()</function> disables preemption on the local CPU > > + (so you won't suddenly get moved to another CPU) and then returns > > + the local CPU id as a number ranging from 0 up to (but not including) > > + <symbol>NR_CPUS</symbol>; subsequently returned CPU ids are not > > + necessarily contiguous. > > It occurred to me that the original 'continuous' means 'constant' > rather than 'contiguous'. However, given the introduction of the term > 'local CPU', I don't think that this sentence is even necessary > anymore. How about just removing it? > -- Remove that entire paragraph (above) or just the "subsequently returned CPU ids are not necessarily contiguous." part of it? Removing the latter makes sense to me. --- ~Randy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
