Re: sysrq: no time for terseness

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



jidanni@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>>>>>> "MM" == Moritz Muehlenhoff <jmm@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
> MM> On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 09:44:17AM +0800, jidanni@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> MM> This bug still applies to the current sysrq documentation. Please send
> MM> your improved documentation suggestions to the Kernel documentation
> MM> maintainers at linux-doc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> They will surely want a patch, a git patch, and all that will take me
>>> several years to learn, as I have just started...
> 
> MM> For documentation I'm pretty sure that a regular text would suffice.
> 
> MM> Cheers,
> MM>         Moritz
> 
> Looking at this (
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=330403 ) bug again,
> it seems I'm in little position to make a patch, as I am pointing out
> things I don't know, so CC'ing linux-doc.

Thanks for the message.  and a git patch surely isn't necessary.
Just a patch would be fine.

I'll look into this.

-- 
~Randy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux