On Fri, 28 Nov 2008 03:00:26 -0600 Rob Landley <rob@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wednesday 26 November 2008 10:15:21 Pavel Machek wrote: > > Document how to deal with bad memory reported with memtest. > ... > > +BadRAM > > +###### > > +BadRAM is the actively developed and available as kernel-patch > > +here: http://rick.vanrein.org/linux/badram/ > > So the patch isn't worth merging, but documentation about the out-of-tree > patch is worth merging? > > I'm not objecting, I'm just confused about to what the merge criteria are... > mm.. If someone finds it useful (and I assume that at least one person would have found it useful, hence the effort to write the patch) then why not? (And yeah, yeah, someone might find a .gif of a parrot useful too. Go do some work.) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
