Re: Document hadling of bad memory

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am Freitag 28 November 2008 10:00:26 schrieb Rob Landley:
> 
> So the patch isn't worth merging, but documentation about the out-of-tree 
> patch is worth merging?
Good point.

IIRC we tried merging the patch, but without luck at that time. It was said, that there's another method
(with an even <irony>better</irony> syntax) which could also handle this case and there should be better 
some hacking to get the syntax parsed to use the functions of this already in-kernel method.
I don't know the status of this (guess: none). 
What I know: badmem worked here really good. (But meantime I bought new ram.)

Best regards,
Jan-Simon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux