Re: [PATCH v5 00/11] perf: Support multiple system call tables in the build

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Mar 14, 2025 at 02:10:54PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 10:45:49PM -0700, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 05:47:27PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > > On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 05:20:09PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > > > Still building, but noticed this on x86_64:
> > > > 
> > > > 105: perf trace enum augmentation tests                              : FAILED!
> > > > 106: perf trace BTF general tests                                    : FAILED!
> > > > 107: perf trace exit race                                            : Ok
> > > > 108: perf trace record and replay                                    : FAILED!
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > The first doesn´t help that much with verbose mode, haven't checked if
> > > > before this series it was failing :-\
> > > > 
> > > > root@x1:~# perf test -vvv 105
> > > > 105: perf trace enum augmentation tests:
> > > > --- start ---
> > > > test child forked, pid 19411
> > > > Checking if vmlinux exists
> > > > Tracing syscall landlock_add_rule
> > > > ---- end(-1) ----
> > > > 105: perf trace enum augmentation tests                              : FAILED!
> > > > root@x1:~#

This one is now ok:

     0.004 ( 0.000 ms): perf/200342 landlock_add_rule(ruleset_fd: 11, rule_type: LANDLOCK_RULE_NET_PORT, rule_attr: 0x7ffd649bd0d0, flags: 45) = -1 EINVAL (Invalid argument)
root@number:~# perf test enum
105: perf trace enum augmentation tests                              : Ok
root@number:~#

now looking at:

root@number:~# perf test -vvvvvvvvv 106
106: perf trace BTF general tests:
--- start ---
test child forked, pid 200467
Checking if vmlinux BTF exists
Testing perf trace's string augmentation
String augmentation test failed
---- end(-1) ----
106: perf trace BTF general tests                                    : FAILED!
root@number:~#

No clue from the test, reading its source code now to see where it is
failing to try and reproduce the problem.

- Arnaldo




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux