On Fri, 2025-02-21 at 17:47 +0800, Huacai Chen wrote: > Hi, Ruoyao, > > On Fri, Feb 21, 2025 at 5:25 PM Xi Ruoyao <xry111@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > glibc added support for .gnu.hash in 2006 and .hash has been obsoleted > > far before the first LoongArch CPU was taped. Using > > --hash-style=sysv might imply unaddressed issues and confuse readers. > > > > In the past we really had an unaddressed issue: the vdso selftests did > > not know how to process .gnu.hash. But it has been addressed by commit > > e0746bde6f82 ("selftests/vDSO: support DT_GNU_HASH") now. > > > > Just drop the option and rely on the linker default, which is likely > > "both" (AOSC) or "gnu" (Arch, Debian, Gentoo, LFS) on all LoongArch > > distros. > What about changing to "--hash-style=both" as most architectures do? IMO we are more close to ARM64 for the aspect that there are no libc (glibc or musl) releases lacking GNU hash support, so I prefer the ARM64 way. Maybe this should be changed for some of other architectures (RISC-V and C-SKY?) as well because I guess the only reason they used "both" was "hey, without this the self tests don't work on Debian" but this is resolved now. Adding a few recipients and Cc for discussion. -- Xi Ruoyao <xry111@xxxxxxxxxxx> School of Aerospace Science and Technology, Xidian University