On Mon, Oct 28, 2024, at 13:42, Julian Vetter wrote:
> Thank you Arnd for your feedback and no problem. I should have asked
> before, to clarify what you meant. I have now addressed what you
> proposed. I have kept the iomem_copy.c and only made the minimal changes
> to asm-generic/io.h and kept them in place just modifiying the content.
> Not sure though about the commit message of patch 1. Let me know if I
> should rephrase it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Julian Vetter <jvetter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Changes for v11:
> - Restored iomem_copy.c
> - Updated asm-generic/io.h to just contain the changes suggested by Arnd
I've applied it to the asm-generic tree now.
It's always possible to improve the commit messages, but I'll
call this good enough, as it's more important to give this some
time testing in linux-next.
Thanks for your work work on this!
Arnd
