On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 7:41 PM Sam Ravnborg <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 07:34:59PM +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote: > > > > I think you somehow missed the Kconfig change, and also the related > > sparc32 change which continue to have set_fs() after this patch. Right, thanks for pointing out the issue. > I now notice the sparc32 bits are in the last patch. > To avoid breaking bisect-ability on sparc64 I think you need to merge > the sparc32 changes with this patch, unless the sparc64 changes can > coexist with CONFIG_SET_FS continue to be set. I originally had them in the reverse order and broke bisectability during my rebase. The end result is still fine, but now I need to move the 'select SET_FS' from CONFIG_SPARC to CONFIG_SPARC32 in this patch and then remove it again from there in the last step. I've done that in my local copy now. Arnd