On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 9:52 PM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 2:06 PM Guo Ren <guoren@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 8:51 PM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 12:34 PM Guo Ren <guoren@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Given that there are no specific rv32 SoC implementations supported > > > by the kernel today (other than SOC_VIRT), the number of users > > > would be close to zero anyway. > > I really agree with you, but we still need the rv32 user mode > > ecosystem for memory footprint. > > Sure, I just meant there are few users that would have to relearn typing > "make defconfig 32-bit.config" instead of "make rv32_defconfig" even > without the added Makefile target. Emm... I got you. Next version, I would send delete rv32_defconfig patch. If Palmer object, I would change to make rv32_defconfig target. ;) > > Arnd -- Best Regards Guo Ren ML: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-csky/
