On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 2:23 AM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Dec 21, 2021 at 5:35 PM <guoren@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > +
> > +config SYSVIPC_COMPAT
> > + def_bool y
> > + depends on COMPAT && SYSVIPC
>
> Can this be moved to init/Kconfig next to SYSVIPC?
I would try another patchset, to see other architecture guys' advice.
$ grep SYSVIPC_COMPAT arch -r
arch/x86/Kconfig:config SYSVIPC_COMPAT
arch/parisc/Kconfig:config SYSVIPC_COMPAT
arch/powerpc/Kconfig:config SYSVIPC_COMPAT
arch/arm64/Kconfig:config SYSVIPC_COMPAT
arch/riscv/Kconfig:config SYSVIPC_COMPAT
arch/s390/Kconfig:config SYSVIPC_COMPAT
arch/mips/Kconfig:config SYSVIPC_COMPAT
arch/mips/Kconfig: select SYSVIPC_COMPAT if SYSVIPC
arch/mips/Kconfig: select SYSVIPC_COMPAT if SYSVIPC
arch/sparc/Kconfig:config SYSVIPC_COMPAT
>
> > +
> > +COMPAT_SYSCALL_DEFINE0(rt_sigreturn)
> > +{
> > + return 0;
> > +}
>
> This confused me a bit while reviewing, would it make sense to reorder the
> patches to add the three missing functions first instead of adding the
> dummy and then replacing it?
Okay, I would try in the next version. Make the compile at last.
>
>
> Arnd
--
Best Regards
Guo Ren
ML: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-csky/
