On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 8:35 PM Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On 2021/9/27 20:09, Guo Ren wrote: > > I didn't see the patch delete: > > #else /* !CONFIG_SPARSE_IRQ */ > > struct irq_desc irq_desc[NR_IRQS] __cacheline_aligned_in_smp = { > > [0 ... NR_IRQS-1] = { > > .handle_irq = handle_bad_irq, > > .depth = 1, > > .lock = __RAW_SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(irq_desc->lock), > > } > > }; > > ... > > > > Flat irq_desc[] is simple and easy for debugging. We do want to del it? > > This patches want to kill MAY_HAVE_SPARSE_IRQ, not !SPARSE_IRQ. > > so I won't delete above parts(eg, ARM could use both SPARSE_IRQ and > > !SPARSE_IRQ via different config,) > > > > > On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 4:11 PM Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Most ARCHs support SPARSE_IRQ, and MAY_HAVE_SPARSE_IRQ is useless, and > >> only sh and csky select it, but the could use SPARSE_IRQ too, let's > >> kill MAY_HAVE_SPARSE_IRQ, also cleanup the kernel/irq/Kconfig a little. Why couldn't choice SPARSE in menuconfig? > >> > >> Kefeng Wang (3): > >> sh: Cleanup about SPARSE_IRQ > >> csky: Use SPARSE_IRQ > >> genirq: Cleanup Kconfig > >> > >> arch/csky/Kconfig | 2 +- > >> arch/sh/Kconfig | 1 - > >> arch/sh/include/asm/irq.h | 9 ------- > >> kernel/irq/Kconfig | 50 ++++++++++++++++----------------------- > >> 4 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) > >> > >> -- > >> 2.26.2 > >> > > -- Best Regards Guo Ren ML: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-csky/