On Tue, Oct 6, 2020 at 12:39 AM Palmer Dabbelt <palmerdabbelt@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Mon, 05 Oct 2020 01:25:22 PDT (-0700), schwab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > On Sep 14 2020, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > > >> How should we proceed to get that fixed in time for 5.9? For the older > >> branches where it has been backported (so far 5.7 and 5.8), should we > >> just get that commit reverted instead? > > > > Why is this still broken? > > Sorry, I hadn't seen this. I'm not seeing a boot failure on 5.9-rc8 with just > CONFIG_HARDENED_USERCPOY=y in addition to defconfig (on QEMU, though I doubt > that's relevant here). It looks like the fix is to essentially revert this, > which I'm fine with, but I'd prefer to have a failing test to make sure this > doesn't break again. > > Guo: I don't see an actual patch (signed off and such) posted for this, do you > mind posting one? Otherwise I'll take a crack at constructing the revert > myself. Please have a look: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/1602002973-92934-1-git-send-email-guoren@xxxxxxxxxx/T/#u The only revert couldn't solve the static_obj problem. -- Best Regards Guo Ren ML: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-csky/