Re: [PATCH v2 00/34] Compiler-Based Capability- and Locking-Analysis

[Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@xxxxxxx>]

On 3/5/25 3:20 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> diff --git a/include/linux/blkdev.h b/include/linux/blkdev.h
> index 248416ecd01c..d27607d9c2dc 100644
> --- a/include/linux/blkdev.h
> +++ b/include/linux/blkdev.h
> @@ -945,6 +945,7 @@ static inline unsigned int blk_boundary_sectors_left(sector_t offset,
>    */
>   static inline struct queue_limits
>   queue_limits_start_update(struct request_queue *q)
> +	__acquires(q->limits_lock)
>   {
>   	mutex_lock(&q->limits_lock);
>   	return q->limits;
> @@ -965,6 +966,7 @@ int blk_validate_limits(struct queue_limits *lim);
>    * starting update.
>    */
>   static inline void queue_limits_cancel_update(struct request_queue *q)
> +	__releases(q->limits_lock)
>   {
>   	mutex_unlock(&q->limits_lock);
>   }

The above is incomplete. Here is what I came up with myself:

diff --git a/include/linux/blkdev.h b/include/linux/blkdev.h
index 248416ecd01c..0d011270e642 100644
--- a/include/linux/blkdev.h
+++ b/include/linux/blkdev.h
@@ -945,15 +945,19 @@ static inline unsigned int 
blk_boundary_sectors_left(sector_t offset,
  */
 static inline struct queue_limits
 queue_limits_start_update(struct request_queue *q)
+       ACQUIRE(q->limits_lock)
 {
        mutex_lock(&q->limits_lock);
        return q->limits;
 }
 int queue_limits_commit_update_frozen(struct request_queue *q,
-               struct queue_limits *lim);
+               struct queue_limits *lim)
+       RELEASE(q->limits_lock);
 int queue_limits_commit_update(struct request_queue *q,
-               struct queue_limits *lim);
-int queue_limits_set(struct request_queue *q, struct queue_limits *lim);
+               struct queue_limits *lim)
+       RELEASE(q->limits_lock);
+int queue_limits_set(struct request_queue *q, struct queue_limits *lim)
+       EXCLUDES(q->limits_lock);
 int blk_validate_limits(struct queue_limits *lim);

 /**
@@ -965,6 +969,7 @@ int blk_validate_limits(struct queue_limits *lim);
  * starting update.
  */
 static inline void queue_limits_cancel_update(struct request_queue *q)
+       RELEASE(q->limits_lock)
 {
        mutex_unlock(&q->limits_lock);
 }

> diff --git a/include/linux/device.h b/include/linux/device.h
> index 80a5b3268986..283fb85d96c8 100644
> --- a/include/linux/device.h
> +++ b/include/linux/device.h
> @@ -1026,21 +1026,25 @@ static inline bool dev_pm_test_driver_flags(struct device *dev, u32 flags)
>   }
>   
>   static inline void device_lock(struct device *dev)
> +	__acquires(dev->mutex)
>   {
>   	mutex_lock(&dev->mutex);
>   }
>   
>   static inline int device_lock_interruptible(struct device *dev)
> +	__cond_acquires(0, dev->mutex)
>   {
>   	return mutex_lock_interruptible(&dev->mutex);
>   }
>   
>   static inline int device_trylock(struct device *dev)
> +	__cond_acquires(true, dev->mutex)
>   {
>   	return mutex_trylock(&dev->mutex);
>   }
>   
>   static inline void device_unlock(struct device *dev)
> +	__releases(dev->mutex)
>   {
>   	mutex_unlock(&dev->mutex);
>   }

I propose to annotate these functions with __no_capability_analysis as a
first step. Review of all callers of these functions in the entire
kernel tree learned me that annotating these functions results in a
significant number of false positives and not to the discovery of any
bugs. The false positives are triggered by conditional locking. An
example of code that triggers false positive thread-safety warnings:

static void ath9k_hif_usb_firmware_fail(struct hif_device_usb *hif_dev)
{
	struct device *dev = &hif_dev->udev->dev;
	struct device *parent = dev->parent;

	complete_all(&hif_dev->fw_done);

	if (parent)
		device_lock(parent);

	device_release_driver(dev);

	if (parent)
		device_unlock(parent);
}

Thanks,

Bart.