QE tested this patch with virtio-net regression tests, everything works fine.
Tested-by: Lei Yang <leiyang@xxxxxxxxxx>
On Tue, Mar 4, 2025 at 3:08 AM Christophe JAILLET
<christophe.jaillet@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> virtcrypto_clear_request() does the same as the code here, but uses
> kfree_sensitive() for one of the free operation.
>
> So, better safe than sorry, use virtcrypto_clear_request() directly to
> save a few lines of code and cleanly free the memory.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> I've no idea if this is needed or not, but it looks not consistent to me.
>
> If safe as-is, maybe the kfree_sensitive() in virtcrypto_clear_request()
> should be removed instead.
> ---
> drivers/crypto/virtio/virtio_crypto_core.c | 6 ++----
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/crypto/virtio/virtio_crypto_core.c b/drivers/crypto/virtio/virtio_crypto_core.c
> index d0278eb568b9..0d522049f595 100644
> --- a/drivers/crypto/virtio/virtio_crypto_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/crypto/virtio/virtio_crypto_core.c
> @@ -480,10 +480,8 @@ static void virtcrypto_free_unused_reqs(struct virtio_crypto *vcrypto)
>
> for (i = 0; i < vcrypto->max_data_queues; i++) {
> vq = vcrypto->data_vq[i].vq;
> - while ((vc_req = virtqueue_detach_unused_buf(vq)) != NULL) {
> - kfree(vc_req->req_data);
> - kfree(vc_req->sgs);
> - }
> + while ((vc_req = virtqueue_detach_unused_buf(vq)) != NULL)
> + virtcrypto_clear_request(vc_req);
> cond_resched();
> }
> }
> --
> 2.48.1
>
>
