On Sat, Feb 15, 2025 at 02:14:52PM +0100, Christian Marangi wrote: > Thanks, this wasn't reported in the first run so sorry for not noticing > this. I will take care of sending a follow-up patch to address this. > On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 06:23:01PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > > > drivers/crypto/inside-secure/eip93/eip93-common.c:233 check_valid_request() warn: 'src_nents' unsigned <= 0 > > drivers/crypto/inside-secure/eip93/eip93-common.c:237 check_valid_request() warn: error code type promoted to positive: 'src_nents' > > drivers/crypto/inside-secure/eip93/eip93-common.c:240 check_valid_request() warn: error code type promoted to positive: 'dst_nents' The first one isn't a published check. I should clean it up and publish it. It has a few false positives where the less than zero is harmless but it doesn't print too many warnings. The latter two warnings require the cross function database to work. The check needs to know which functions return negative error codes. regards, dan carpenter
