Re: [PATCH v3] riscv: Optimize crct10dif with zbc extension

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 04:08:51PM +0800, Zhihang Shao wrote:
> On 2025/2/6 0:30, Eric Biggers wrote:
> 
> > Maybe use 'const __be64 *' and 'const __be32 *' for the pointer, and use
> > be64_to_cpu() and be32_to_cpu().  Then the __force cast won't be needed.
> Maybe this problem seems dumb, but I have no idea to adapt both riscv32 and
> riscv64. I have tried to use 'const __be64 *' and 'const __be32 *' pointer
> in patch v4, but I forgot to test them in riscv32, and it turns out the code
> failed to compile due to my mistake of defining 'const __be64 * p_ul' and of
> course it wouldn't be work for riscv32. Maybe I need some inspiration for
> this problem, or I still think it better to use 'unsigned long const *'
> since it works fine in both riscv64 and riscv32.
> 
> Looking forward to your reply and guidance.
> 
> Yours,
> 
> Zhihang
> 

I'm working on this patch and am going to send out a cleaned-up version.

- Eric




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel]     [Gnu Classpath]     [Gnu Crypto]     [DM Crypt]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]
  Powered by Linux