Calling cpumask_next_wrap_old() with starting CPU == -1 effectively means
the request to find next CPU, wrapping around if needed.
cpumask_next_wrap() is the proper replacement for that.
Acked-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Yury Norov <yury.norov@xxxxxxxxx>
---
kernel/padata.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/padata.c b/kernel/padata.c
index 78e202fabf90..b3d4eacc4f5d 100644
--- a/kernel/padata.c
+++ b/kernel/padata.c
@@ -290,7 +290,7 @@ static struct padata_priv *padata_find_next(struct parallel_data *pd,
if (remove_object) {
list_del_init(&padata->list);
++pd->processed;
- pd->cpu = cpumask_next_wrap_old(cpu, pd->cpumask.pcpu, -1, false);
+ pd->cpu = cpumask_next_wrap(cpu, pd->cpumask.pcpu);
}
spin_unlock(&reorder->lock);
--
2.43.0
