Hello,
On 14.01.2025 04:15, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 10, 2025 at 06:22:40PM +0000, Michael Kelley wrote:
>
> Thanks for testing! The patch needs one more change though as
> moving the atomic_inc outside of the lock was a bad idea on my
> part. This could cause atomic_inc/atomic_dec to be reordered
> thus resulting in an underflow.
>
> Thanks,
I've tested v3 patch on s390 for the boot OOM problem with 'mem=1G'
kernel parameter we experience on current linux-next kernel and confirm
that the issue is no longer present.
Tested-by: Mikhail Zaslonko <zaslonko@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> ---8<---
> The test on whether rhashtable_insert_one did an insertion relies
> on the value returned by rhashtable_lookup_one. Unfortunately that
> value is overwritten after rhashtable_insert_one returns. Fix this
> by moving the test before data gets overwritten.
>
> Simplify the test as only data == NULL matters.
>
> Finally move atomic_inc back within the lock as otherwise it may
> be reordered with the atomic_dec on the removal side, potentially
> leading to an underflow.
>
> Reported-by: Michael Kelley <mhklinux@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Fixes: e1d3422c95f0 ("rhashtable: Fix potential deadlock by moving schedule_work outside lock")
> Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> diff --git a/lib/rhashtable.c b/lib/rhashtable.c
> index bf956b85455a..0e9a1d4cf89b 100644
> --- a/lib/rhashtable.c
> +++ b/lib/rhashtable.c
> @@ -611,21 +611,23 @@ static void *rhashtable_try_insert(struct rhashtable *ht, const void *key,
> new_tbl = rht_dereference_rcu(tbl->future_tbl, ht);
> data = ERR_PTR(-EAGAIN);
> } else {
> + bool inserted;
> +
> flags = rht_lock(tbl, bkt);
> data = rhashtable_lookup_one(ht, bkt, tbl,
> hash, key, obj);
> new_tbl = rhashtable_insert_one(ht, bkt, tbl,
> hash, obj, data);
> + inserted = data && !new_tbl;
> + if (inserted)
> + atomic_inc(&ht->nelems);
> if (PTR_ERR(new_tbl) != -EEXIST)
> data = ERR_CAST(new_tbl);
>
> rht_unlock(tbl, bkt, flags);
>
> - if (PTR_ERR(data) == -ENOENT && !new_tbl) {
> - atomic_inc(&ht->nelems);
> - if (rht_grow_above_75(ht, tbl))
> - schedule_work(&ht->run_work);
> - }
> + if (inserted && rht_grow_above_75(ht, tbl))
> + schedule_work(&ht->run_work);
> }
> } while (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(new_tbl));
>
Thanks!
