On Thu, Jan 02, 2025 at 09:10:15AM +0800, Herbert Xu wrote: > On Sun, Dec 29, 2024 at 12:54:47PM -1000, Tejun Heo wrote: > > > > Hmm... the only meaningful behavior difference would be that after the > > patch, rht_grow_above_75() test is done regardless of the return value while > > before it was done only when the return value is zero. Breno, can you please > > look into whether this report is valid and whether restoring the NULL check > > makes it go away? > > Actually I fixed that when committing the patch. It should be > conditional on whether the insertion succeeds or not. Thanks. I am finally back from vacation. I will try to reproduce the issue reported in this report, and double-check the regression. --breno
