On Sat Nov 2, 2024 at 12:04 AM EET, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Fri, Nov 01 2024 at 23:19, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > > On Fri Nov 1, 2024 at 11:13 PM EET, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > >> I think we can sort them out independently as long as we find a > >> conclusion how to address locality change. > > > > And to be fair: there was no reaction from anyone. It is mostly x86 > > patch set, meaning that I was waiting for some reaction first from that > > side. And I did respond to that when it came. > > The x86 side is mostly self contained, so the damage there is minimal, > but the TPM parts are changing the generic operations and the x86 parts > depend on them. > > So let's not create a chicken and egg problem and solve the TPM parts, > which at my cursory glance are partially legitimate fixes, independent > of the actual trenchboot x86 functionality. Yeah, I'm already writing a (draft/RFC) patch to demonstrate my proposal that I sent so all good. > > Thanks, > > tglx BR, Jarkko
