On Tue, 2024-08-27 at 17:00 +0200, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote: > The effect of this patch is to replace include/uapi with usr/include, so > it will break for you too. > > What I'm wondering is why yours and mine work like that, while Ruoyao's > breaks. He makes a good argument as to why this patch is the "right > way", even if it breaks our workflow... Because arch/loongarch/include/uapi/asm/sigcontext.h includes <linux/posix_types.h>, but the files for x86 and ppc do not. I cannot see how this inclusion is useful anyway, so maybe I can just remove the inclusion and paper over the real issue for now? -- Xi Ruoyao <xry111@xxxxxxxxxxx> School of Aerospace Science and Technology, Xidian University
