On 5. Aug 2024, at 19:59, Eric Biggers <ebiggers@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 05, 2024 at 07:52:38PM +0200, Thorsten Blum wrote:
>> struct poly_req {
>> @@ -611,8 +611,8 @@ static int chachapoly_create(struct crypto_template *tmpl, struct rtattr **tb,
>> poly->base.cra_priority) / 2;
>> inst->alg.base.cra_blocksize = 1;
>> inst->alg.base.cra_alignmask = chacha->base.cra_alignmask;
>> - inst->alg.base.cra_ctxsize = sizeof(struct chachapoly_ctx) +
>> - ctx->saltlen;
>> + inst->alg.base.cra_ctxsize = struct_size_t(struct chachapoly_ctx, salt,
>> + ctx->saltlen);
>
> What was wrong with the more straightforward code it had before?
There's nothing wrong with it, but I find using the helper macro
struct_size_t() more straightforward. It's just a refactoring; happy to
take it out if there's a preference for the open coded version.
Thanks,
Thorsten
