On Wed, Jul 24, 2024 at 08:07:51AM +0200, Dragan Simic wrote: > Thanks a lot for the testing. Though, such wildly different test results > can, regrettably, lead to only one conclusion: the HWRNG found in RK3566 > is unusable. :/ The results on RK3568 look much better and the series right now also only enabled the RNG on RK3568 systems. However, we have only seen few boards with RK3568 up to now, and I only got a couple of NanoPi R5C here to test, all with good hwrng results. Do you think it would be agreeable to only enable the HWRNG for RK3568 as suggested in this series? Or are we expecting quality to also vary as much as it (sadly) does for RK3566?
