On Mon, Jul 08, 2024 at 10:23:10AM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote: > > As a side note, I'll raise that I am not a particular fan of the > > "droppable" terminology, at least with the "read 0s" approach. > > > > From a user perspective, the memory might suddenly lose its state and > > read as 0s just like volatile memory when it loses power. "dropping > > pages" sounds more like an implementation detail. > > Long story short: it's the hypervisor that could be effectively > dropping/zeroing out that memory, not the guest VM. "NONVOLATILE" might > be clearer than "DROPPABLE". Surely you mean "VOLATILE", not "NONVOLATILE", right? Jason
