Am Freitag, 21. Juni 2024, 11:36:45 CEST schrieb Diederik de Haas:
> On Friday, 21 June 2024 03:25:30 CEST Daniel Golle wrote:
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk356x.dtsi
> > b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk356x.dtsi index d8543b5557ee..57c8103500ea
> > 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk356x.dtsi
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk356x.dtsi
> > @@ -1855,6 +1855,15 @@ usb2phy1_otg: otg-port {
> > };
> > };
> >
> > + rng: rng@fe388000 {
> > + compatible = "rockchip,rk3568-rng";
> > + reg = <0x0 0xfe388000 0x0 0x4000>;
> > + clocks = <&cru CLK_TRNG_NS>, <&cru HCLK_TRNG_NS>;
> > + clock-names = "core", "ahb";
> > + resets = <&cru SRST_TRNG_NS>;
> > + reset-names = "reset";
> > + };
> > +
> > pinctrl: pinctrl {
> > compatible = "rockchip,rk3568-pinctrl";
> > rockchip,grf = <&grf>;
> > --
>
> I had placed the node between ``sdhci: mmc@fe310000`` and
> ``i2s0_8ch: i2s@fe400000`` which I think is the proper order.
correct.
If a node has an address in its name, sort by that address.
