On Mon, Jun 03, 2024 at 02:15:08PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote: > On Wed, May 22, 2024 at 12:17:41PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > > On Tue, May 21, 2024 at 09:22:49PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > > > The NEON implementation of crctd10dif is registered with a priority of 100 > > > which is identical to that used by the generic C implementation. Raise the > > > priority to 150, half way between the PMULL based implementation and the > > > NEON one, so that it will be preferred over the generic implementation. > > That second NEON should be PMULL, sorry. > Sorry, I don't grok that now: > | half way between the PMULL based implementation and the PMULL one > doesn't mean anything? Yes, one of those PMULLs should say generic (I thought I'd sent a followup saying that, sorry).
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
