There is a confusing pattern in the kernel to use a variable named 'timeout' to store the result of wait_for_completion_timeout() causing patterns like: timeout = wait_for_completion_timeout(...) if (!timeout) return -ETIMEDOUT; with all kinds of permutations. Use 'time_left' as a variable to make the code self explaining. Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/fpga/zynq-fpga.c | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/fpga/zynq-fpga.c b/drivers/fpga/zynq-fpga.c index 0ac93183d201..4db3d80e10b0 100644 --- a/drivers/fpga/zynq-fpga.c +++ b/drivers/fpga/zynq-fpga.c @@ -387,7 +387,7 @@ static int zynq_fpga_ops_write(struct fpga_manager *mgr, struct sg_table *sgt) const char *why; int err; u32 intr_status; - unsigned long timeout; + unsigned long time_left; unsigned long flags; struct scatterlist *sg; int i; @@ -427,8 +427,8 @@ static int zynq_fpga_ops_write(struct fpga_manager *mgr, struct sg_table *sgt) zynq_step_dma(priv); spin_unlock_irqrestore(&priv->dma_lock, flags); - timeout = wait_for_completion_timeout(&priv->dma_done, - msecs_to_jiffies(DMA_TIMEOUT_MS)); + time_left = wait_for_completion_timeout(&priv->dma_done, + msecs_to_jiffies(DMA_TIMEOUT_MS)); spin_lock_irqsave(&priv->dma_lock, flags); zynq_fpga_set_irq(priv, 0); @@ -452,7 +452,7 @@ static int zynq_fpga_ops_write(struct fpga_manager *mgr, struct sg_table *sgt) if (priv->cur_sg || !((intr_status & IXR_D_P_DONE_MASK) == IXR_D_P_DONE_MASK)) { - if (timeout == 0) + if (time_left == 0) why = "DMA timed out"; else why = "DMA did not complete"; -- 2.43.0