[PATCH v12 24/29] KVM: SEV: Avoid WBINVD for HVA-based MMU notifications for SNP

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: Ashish Kalra <ashish.kalra@xxxxxxx>

With SNP/guest_memfd, private/encrypted memory should not be mappable,
and MMU notifications for HVA-mapped memory will only be relevant to
unencrypted guest memory. Therefore, the rationale behind issuing a
wbinvd_on_all_cpus() in sev_guest_memory_reclaimed() should not apply
for SNP guests and can be ignored.

Signed-off-by: Ashish Kalra <ashish.kalra@xxxxxxx>
[mdr: Add some clarifications in commit]
Signed-off-by: Michael Roth <michael.roth@xxxxxxx>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c | 9 ++++++++-
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c
index 31f6f4786503..3e8de7cb3c89 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c
@@ -2975,7 +2975,14 @@ static void sev_flush_encrypted_page(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, void *va)
 
 void sev_guest_memory_reclaimed(struct kvm *kvm)
 {
-	if (!sev_guest(kvm))
+	/*
+	 * With SNP+gmem, private/encrypted memory should be
+	 * unreachable via the hva-based mmu notifiers. Additionally,
+	 * for shared->private translations, H/W coherency will ensure
+	 * first guest access to the page would clear out any existing
+	 * dirty copies of that cacheline.
+	 */
+	if (!sev_guest(kvm) || sev_snp_guest(kvm))
 		return;
 
 	wbinvd_on_all_cpus();
-- 
2.25.1





[Index of Archives]     [Kernel]     [Gnu Classpath]     [Gnu Crypto]     [DM Crypt]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]
  Powered by Linux