On 27/03/2024 14:34, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Wed, 2024-03-27 at 13:40 +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >> virtio core already sets the .owner, so driver does not need to. > >> All further patches depend on the first virtio patch, therefore please ack >> and this should go via one tree: virtio? > > Sure. Though it's not really actually necessary, you can set it in the > core and merge the other patches in the next cycle; those drivers that > _have_ an .owner aren't broken after all. > > Acked-by: Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> True, this can be spread over two cycles. What I wanted to express, is that maintainers should not pick individual patches. Thanks for the Ack and apologies for a bit too big CC-list. I need to learn how to ask b4 to make Cc-per-patch for such case. Best regards, Krzysztof
